4.3 C
New York
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
HomeIndia NewsSupreme Court of India recognises 'living will' by terminally-ill patients for passive...

Supreme Court of India recognises ‘living will’ by terminally-ill patients for passive euthanasia

Date:

Related stories

Iran expands Gulf attacks as regional conflict eepens, oil routes disrupted

Highlights: Iran launched coordinated strikes across Gulf nations, targeting...

Trump calls on global allies to secure Strait of Hormuz as shipping slows

Highlights: Trump called on countries dependent on Gulf oil...

Who is Banksy? Reuters investigation points to Bristol artist Robin Gunningham

Highlights: Reuters investigation links Banksy to Bristol-born artist Robin...

Gas shortages hit India as Middle East conflict disrupts LNG and LPG supply routes

Highlights: Gas shortages in India emerge after disruptions to...

US opens trade investigation into India, China and other major economies

Highlights: The US launched an investigation under Section 301...

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India on Friday recognised ‘living will’ made by terminally-ill patients for passive euthanasia. A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra said passive euthanasia and advance living will are “permissible”. The bench, also comprising justices A K Sikri, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan also laid down guidelines as to who would execute the will and how the nod for passive euthanasia would be granted by the medical board. The apex court said that advance directives for terminally-ill patients could be issued and executed by the next friend and relatives of such person after which a medical board would consider it. The top court said that directions and guidelines laid down by it and its directive shall remain in force till a legislation is brought on the issue.
The CJI, while reading out the judgment, said that though there were four separate opinions of the bench but all the judges were unanimous that the ‘living will’ should be permitted since a person cannot be allowed to continue suffering in a comatose state when he or she doesn’t wish to live. The top court had in 2011 recognised passive euthanasia in Aruna Shanbaug case by which it had permitted withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from patients not in a position to make an informed decision. The bench was hearing a PIL filed by NGO Common Cause, saying safeguards were needed while taking a decision by medical boards to withdraw life support of a terminally-ill patient. On January 15, 2016, the Centre had said the 241st report of the Law Commission stated that passive euthanasia should be allowed with certain safeguards and there was also a proposed law –Medical Treatment of Terminally Ill Patient (Protection of Patients and Medical Practitioners) Bill, 2006.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here