Highlights:
- Centre supports CBFC clearance for The Kerala Story 2
- Petition questions film’s impact on public order and morality
- Court raises concerns over certain thematic references
- Original film triggered political and social debate in 2023
- Release of The Kerala Story 2 may be affected by legal proceedings
The Indian central government has defended the certification granted to The Kerala Story 2 before the Kerala High Court, stating that freedom of expression cannot be curtailed. The Centre argued that the petition seeking cancellation of the film’s certification is premature and that there is no immediate threat to public order.
The Kerala Story 2 has drawn renewed legal and political attention ahead of its planned release later in 2026. The matter comes amid objections raised over the sequel’s themes, promotional material, and potential impact on public order.
The Kerala Story 2: Petition Challenges Certification
The petition before the Kerala High Court challenges the clearance issued by the Central Board of Film Certification for The Kerala Story 2. The petitioner argues that the CBFC did not properly assess whether the film could disrupt public order, decency, morality, or national integrity.
Objections were also raised against the promotional tagline “we will not tolerate anymore, we will fight,” which the petitioner described as provocative. The continued use of the title The Kerala Story 2 has also been questioned.
In response, the Centre maintained that the CBFC followed due process under Section 5B guidelines of the Cinematograph Act. The government stated that the film was examined in detail before certification was granted.
The Kerala Story 2: Government’s Argument on Creative Freedom
Representing the Centre, senior counsel Arjun Venugopal told the court that the film had undergone detailed scrutiny. He stated that The Kerala Story 2 has been categorized as a “fictionalized dramatization inspired by true events.”
The CBFC concluded that the film does not portray Kerala or any particular community in a derogatory manner. According to submissions made in court, the examining committee included subject experts, including a socio-political academic and Kerala-based social activists.
The Centre argued that freedom of expression under Article 19(1)(a) protects the film. It further contended that courts should not replace expert opinion unless there is a clear and proximate threat to public order. The government emphasized that “creative freedom cannot be curbed.”
The Kerala Story 2: Court Raises Concerns
During the hearing, Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas raised concerns about certain elements of The Kerala Story 2. He reportedly questioned references in the film that suggest the implementation of Sharia law.
The judge cautioned filmmakers against placing the court “in a corner” by rushing the release of the film while legal proceedings are ongoing.
The High Court has not yet issued a final order on the matter. However, the observations indicate that the court is closely examining both the certification process and the content referenced in promotional material.
The Kerala Story and Its Impact
The legal scrutiny surrounding The Kerala Story 2 echoes the debate triggered by the first installment, The Kerala Story, released in May 2023. Directed by Sudipto Sen and produced by Vipul Amrutlal Shah, the film starred Adah Sharma in the lead role, alongside Yogita Bihani, Sonia Balani, and Siddhi Idnani.
The first film depicted a fictional account of Hindu women allegedly radicalized and recruited by extremist groups. Its makers stated that it was inspired by real events. Critics, however, accused the film of promoting stereotypes and inflaming communal tensions.
Several political leaders supported the film, while others called for bans. Some states attempted to restrict screenings. Courts ultimately allowed its release with disclaimers.
Despite the controversy, the original film performed strongly at the Indian box office and attracted international attention, including among the Indian diaspora. Audience response was divided. Supporters described it as a bold exposé, while detractors called it divisive and misleading.
he Kerala Story 2 and the Ongoing Constitutional Debate
The case surrounding The Kerala Story 2 has once again brought attention to the balance between artistic freedom and public sensitivity in India. The Centre’s defense of the film’s certification underscores its position that creative expression should not be restricted without clear legal grounds.
At the same time, the court’s questions indicate that judicial oversight remains active when concerns about public order are raised.
As proceedings continue, The Kerala Story 2 remains at the center of legal review, public debate, and constitutional discussion.
