INDIA'S main public health programmes, aimed at millions of rural poor, have been in disarray for months because the government changed the way that over $1.3bn in federal funds were distributed, according to data and letters seen by reporters.
In a bid last year to give India's states more power, the federal health ministry started sending funds for public health programmes to state treasuries, instead of direct transfers to its regional arms.
But poorly-run regional bureaucracies were unable to cope and both the flagship National Health Mission (NHM) and India's AIDS prevention programmes suffered – thousands of health workers were not paid for months and the construction of clinics in rural areas was delayed.
In some cases, state governments temporarily used the funds earmarked for health programmes to meet needs of other sectors, health officials said.
The funds involved amounted to about one-third of the total federal spending on health, and led to further deterioration in India's tattered public health system.
Eleven letters obtained by a reporter under India's Right to Information Act revealed the health ministry's desperate, and failed, attempts to push states to release funds to NHM arms.
“The progress in NHM works has slowed down considerably in most of the states,” federal Health Minister JP Nadda wrote in a letter to the finance minister in November.
“I urge you to review the decision and allow the ministry to transfer funds directly to state health societies.”
The decision last year to route many payments through states, launched by the previous Congress party-led government, affected other sectors as well, but the impact on health programmes has been glaring.
India spends just one per cent of its GDP on public health, less than Afghanistan and Sierra Leone. On Saturday (February 28), the federal government increased the annual budget for its main health department by just two per cent to $4.8bn.
Still, India struggles to spend all of its allocated health funds because of an inadequate number of doctors and hospitals, and bureaucratic bungling. Data shows the government has only once spent all of its health budget since 2005.
Since April, the federal government has sent more than $1.3bn to the states for the NHM, which undertakes treatment of diseases such as tuberculosis and malaria, construction of rural health centres and immunisation drives.
No state treasury released the funds to the designated health societies within a stipulated 15-day period, with delays running into months in some cases, according to government data seen by reporters. More than $180m is still to be released.
Manoj Jhalani, joint secretary at India's health ministry, told reporters that several states have voiced concern about the delays and discussions are ongoing to resolve the situation.
“If resources are not provided in time, implementation of the programme does get affected. There has been some impact on the smooth operation of NHM,” Jhalani said.
Several NHM officials interviewed by reporters said the state health units were deprived of funds for months. Salaries, training and building new clinics were hit.
In the northern state of Jammu and Kashmir, 9,000 health workers have not received salaries for three months and cash incentives for women who give birth in a government hospital have been withheld, said Yash Pal Sharma, the state's director for the NHM.
Treasuries in the north-eastern states of Meghalaya and Mizoram held NHM funds for 151 days and 79 days, respectively, data as of February 22 showed. In India's third-largest state Maharashtra, funds sent in June reached the health society in December.
“Outreach programmes have been severely impacted,” said a health ministry official in New Delhi. “The entire system has been paralysed, bureaucracy has become bureau-crazy.”
India's AIDS prevention drive, a programme separate from the NHM, was also affected by the new payments system. Workers from high-risk groups, such as sex workers and injectable drug users, who are employed to run programmes within their communities are quitting because of irregular pay.
Rama, a project manager in one such community-based programme for sex workers in Mumbai, said 17 of her 23 team members have quit because of delayed salaries. New people hired will take months before they can efficiently run the programme.
“It takes a lot of time to build trust within our communities. Our HIV testing numbers have fallen by half because sex workers don't trust new people,” said the 26-year-old, who says she moonlights as a sex worker herself to survive.
India runs more than 1,800 community-based programmes for AIDS prevention. The World Bank has estimated India's policy of targeting sex workers to control AIDS would avert three million infections during 1995-2015.
Government data showed that India's National AIDS Control Organisation released $67m to state governments in recent months as a second installment for the overall programme, but only $39m reached its state-level health societies. The first installment of $78m was released by state treasuries after months of delays.
“What can we do if states are not caring about its people?” said a government official in the federal capital, New Delhi. “Now we are at risk of the numbers (of AIDS patients) increasing again.”
