14 C
London
Thursday, April 18, 2024
HomeBusinessIndia court leaves fate of Future’s $3.4 bln deal opposed by Amazon...

India court leaves fate of Future’s $3.4 bln deal opposed by Amazon to regulators

Date:

Related stories

Public has pessimistic view on AI, 52% are nervous of using it: Study

The annual Stanford AI Index Report 2024 highlights several...

Airtel to merge Sri Lanka operations with Dialog Axiata

BHARTI AIRTEL and Dialog Axiata are set to merge...

Setback for Colombo as talks falter over debt restructuring

BANKRUPT Sri Lanka said on Tuesday (16) it had...

Not just Tesla, Starlink and X also on agenda during Musk’s India visit

Billionaire Elon Musk is gearing up for a visit...

Essar Group firm appoints Rob Wallace as CEO

ESSAR ENERGY TRANSITION on Wednesday (17) announced the appointment...

An Indian court on Monday left it to regulators to decide the fate of the $3.38 billion sale of Future Group’s retail assets to Reliance Industries Ltd , but allowed US partner Amazon.com Inc to raise objections to it.

Hammered by the coronavirus pandemic, Future sold its retail assets to oil-to-clothes conglomerate Reliance in August but Amazon said the deal breached agreements Future made with the US ecommerce leader in 2019.

Analysts expect the Reliance deal, which has now cleared anti-trust hurdles, to go through despite the High Court of Delhi on Monday dismissing a plea from Future to restrain Amazon – which owns a small indirect stake in Future Retail – from interfering in the transaction.

The pursuit of Future Retail Ltd has been billed as the battle of the billionaires – namely Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Reliance’s Mukesh Ambani.

If the deal with Reliance goes ahead, it will delay Amazon’s goal of capturing India’s massive groceries market that Forrester Research estimates will be worth $740 billion a year by 2024.

“The present application is disposed of …” the court said in its written order about the Future petition.

“However, the Statutory Authorities/Regulators are directed to take the decision on the applications/objections in accordance with the law.”

Amazon emailed a one-line statement welcoming the verdict, while Future said it was consulting with legal advisors.

“It is being portrayed that just because the interim injunction has not been granted, this round has gone to Amazon, which is not true,” said Shweta Dubey, partner at legal firm SD Partners.

“There have been certain significant observations in the judgement which have put Future in a very advantageous position.”

The court said Reliance and Future’s agreement “satisfies the requirement of a valid contract”, although Justice Mukta Gupta noted in the verdict that Amazon cannot be barred from writing to regulators on account of potentially irreparable damage.

Reliance and Future dominate India’s grocery market, with the next competitor, Avenue Supermarts Ltd’s DMart, far behind in terms of stores and reach.

Future is widely credited as transforming India’s retail sector in recent decades. However, Kishore Biyani sought a buyer after its stores bore the brunt of virus related lockdowns.

“Even if money-wise Amazon can invest as much as Reliance, you will need still time to build the infrastructure on ground,” said Satish Meena, senior Forrester forecast analyst, of Amazon’s grocery ambitions in the country.

“That is something that Amazon will need to do from scratch or acquire or tie-up with other Indian grocery or retailers.”

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories