THE Supreme Court placed batting legend Sunil Gavaskar in charge of the troubled Indian Premier League on Friday (March 28) after forcing scandal-tainted cricket board president N Srinivasan from office.
Three days after warning Srinivasan they would order him to stand down if he tried to cling to power, a panel of judges announced that 64-year-old Gavaskar would now take charge of the board's flagship tournament.
Gavaskar would be made “interim working president” with responsibility for the IPL when it begins next month, while Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) vice-president Shivlal Yadav would be in charge of the board's day-to-day administration.
The Twenty20 competition has been embroiled in allegations of illegal betting and spot-fixing, including against Srinivasan's son-in-law.
However it was not immediately clear if Gavaskar would stay on beyond the tournament which begins next month, with a lawyer for the BCCI saying only a current board member could take over on a permanent basis.
There was no immediate reaction from Gavaskar to Friday's announcement but he has already indicated his willingness to step up to the helm of the most powerful body in world cricket.
A lawyer for the board meanwhile said the BCCI “fully endorse(d) the order passed by the Supreme Court today”, saying it was in line with its own proposals to the judges.
In its announcement, the court also said that the Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals – the teams at the centre of allegations of illegal betting and spot-fixing in last year's competition – would be allowed to take part in this year's IPL.
The same panel of judges said on Thursday (March 27) that both sides should be barred from the eight-team tournament which starts in Abu Dhabi next month.
Relief for board
The U-turn will be a huge relief to the board, with The Times of India estimating the total loss resulting from the teams' suspension could have been as much as $1.5bn.
“It would have affected the tournament as well as millions of cricket-loving public,” C A Sundaram, one of the board's lawyers, told reporters after the hearing.
“We are very happy that the court has not passed any order that would have interrupted the tournament.”
While there was no immediate reaction from Srinivasan, Sundaram reiterated he had been willing to “stand aside” during the investigations.
The judges were seemingly unimpressed by Srinivasan's offer, aware that he stood aside last year before resuming his duties and then winning re-election.
On Tuesday (March 25), the judges had said Srinivasan's presence as head of the organisation was preventing a fair probe into the allegations, calling his refusal to quit “nauseating”.
