-1.2 C
Friday, December 1, 2023
HomeNewsIndia NewsSC holds Vijay Mallya guilty of contempt

SC holds Vijay Mallya guilty of contempt


Related stories

After 50 years US set to return to Moon on January 25

The head of a potentially pioneering private company has...

Arthanayake raises mental health concerns amidst white colleague dominance

BRITISH ASIAN BBC presenter Nihal Arthanayake expressed concerns about...

Coolie: 40 years of an all time classic

CLASSIC film Coolie captured the attention of Bollywood fans...

Kissinger advocated strong ties with India during Modi’s leadership

HENRY KISSINGER, known for his disdain for India’s leadership...

NASA partners with India for space station voyage training

NASA will train an Indian astronaut for a voyage...
Supreme Court held that loan defaulters must be dealt with iron hands, it convicted absconder industrialist Vijay Mallya for contempt of court. A bench of Justices AK Goel and UU Lalit held him guilty on two grounds and directed him to personally appear before it on July 10 when the court would decide quantum of punishment to be awarded to him.
The court passed the order on a contempt plea filed by a consortium of banks led by the SBI which sought action against Mallya for allegedly diverting $40 million to his children's accounts in foreign banks in violation of the court order.
The apex court had started proceeding against Mallya and had issued notice to him on March 8, 2016 on the plea by banks for recovery of about Rs 9,000 crore which Mallya and his companies owed to them. He, however, managed to flee the country days before SC took up the case against him.
Pleading the court to direct Mallya to bring back $40 million, which he received from Diageo, Attorney General had told the bench that Mallya had breached the SC order and his refusal to bring back the money had aggravated his breach and he should be directed to appear personally before the court.
"He has taken court for ride and we are taking action to bring him back. He has not made a honest disclosure regarding $40 million. We don't know how to get back the money but majesty of court is very important and he must abide by court's order, " Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi had said. The court, however, had raised question on how its order, if it was passed against Mallya, would be executed as he was living in the UK. It asked the Attorney General to provide modalities under which its order would be implemented. 


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

13 + 16 =