11.7 C
London
Friday, April 19, 2024
HomeNewsIndia NewsArticle 35A was against Islam as it stripped women of right over...

Article 35A was against Islam as it stripped women of right over property: Hussain

Date:

Related stories

India starts voting as Modi aims for third term

India’s polling stations opened on Friday as prime minister...

Explosions in Iran after possible Israeli strike: What we know so far

Explosions were reported in Isfahan, a central province of...

Prince Harry declares US as his new home, renounces British residency

Prince Harry has officially declared the United States as...

Trying to understand Pakistan government’s concerns: X

Social media platform X said Thursday it would work...

Austin: India-US fighter jet engine deal revolutionary

THE India-US deal to jointly produce fighter jet engines...

Senior BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain on Thursday lashed out at “Muslim intellectuals” opposing the abrogation of special status to Jammu and Kashmir and asserted that the now-abolished Article 35A—which prevented residents of other parts of the country from buying property in the northern state—was “against Islam”.

Addressing a press conference in this north Bihar town, the headquarter of East Champaran district, Hussain alleged that the abrogated constitutional provision stripped a woman of rights over ancestral property in the event of she marrying a man from outside Jammu and Kashmir, which was “against the Sharia”.

“There are many Muslim intellectuals who are opposing the Narendra Modi government’s action in Jammu and Kashmir making it a Hindu versus Muslim issue. I want to pose a question to them do they think that Article 35A was in accordance with the Sharia law,” the BJP national spokesman said.

“As per the Sharia law, a girl child cannot be deprived of her rights over the property she inherits from her parents. But Article 35 A made even that conditional. This was against Islam and the Sharia, besides, of course, being in violation of the right to equality guaranteed by the Constitution. Muslim intellectuals should introspect on this issue,” the former Union minister said.

Defending Union minister Amit Shah’s assertion that the National Register for Citizens, which has so far been unrolled only in Assam, would be introduced throughout the country, Hussain asked “what problem do people have with that? Does an illegal immigrant in Assam cease to be one if he hides in Bihar?”

“No country in the world tolerates people crossing its borders illegally. We cannot be expected to allow illegal immigration in India,” Hussain asserted.

Notably, BJP alliance partners like Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s JD(U) besides opposition parties are vehemently opposed to the NRC.

The BJP leader sought to downplay the recent spat between state-level leaders of his party and the JD(U) over the issue of projection of Nitish Kumar as the chief ministerial candidate in the assembly polls next year.

“The BJP is at present busy with preparation for assembly polls in Maharashtra, Haryana and Jharkhand and our chief ministers in the respective states are the party’s face. Bihar assembly polls are far away. The party high command has its hands full and cannot divert its attention towards petty squabbles,” Hussain said.

The JD(U) had, recently, come up with slogans which carried a subtle hint that it would cede no ground to the BJP in the assembly polls, notwithstanding the saffron party expanding its footprints in Bihar under the aggressive leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Amit Shah.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

18 + fifteen =